Marshall v. Upson

343 So. 2d 648, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15480
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1977
DocketNo. 76-1452
StatusPublished

This text of 343 So. 2d 648 (Marshall v. Upson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. Upson, 343 So. 2d 648, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15480 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, William S. Marshall, Nelson C. Keshen and W. H. Stiles, d/b/a Marshall, Keshen & Stiles, take this interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court changing venue to Volusia County, pursuant to a motion by defendant-appellee, Dr. James D. Upson.

Appellants filed a verified complaint for attorney’s fees, alleging that they were licensed Florida attorneys practicing in Dade County and that appellee was a resident of Volusia County; that appellee came to appellants’ offices in Dade County and there agreed to hire appellants to perform legal services in Dade County, for which appellee would pay to appellants at their offices a reasonable fee and related out-of-pocket expenses; that legal services were performed for appellee for which appellants have not been paid as agreed. Appellee filed an unverified motion to dismiss, alleging that the complaint was not brought in the county in which the defendant resides or where the cause of action accrued. The trial court heard oral argument and entered the order' herein appealed.

The uncontroverted facts as alleged in the verified complaint — that the cause of action accrued and the attorney’s fees were to be paid in Dade County — support venue in Dade County. Equilease Corp. v. Clifford, 251 So.2d 40 (Fla.3d D.C.A.1971); Ryder Leasing, Inc. v. Jorge, 168 So.2d 548 (Fla.3d D.C.A.1964). In light of these verified allegations, appellee had the burden of establishing the absence of venue by specific averments, which the record reflects appellee did not do.1 Florida Forms, Inc. v. Barkett Computer Services, Inc., 311 So.2d 730 (Fla.4th D.C.A.1975); Permenter v. Bank of Green Cove Springs, 136 So.2d 377 (Fla.1st D.C.A.1962).

Therefore, the order here under review is reversed with directions to proceed with the cause.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Permenter v. Bank of Green Cove Springs
136 So. 2d 377 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Florida Forms, Inc. v. Barkett Computer Serv., Inc.
311 So. 2d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Ryder Leasing, Inc. v. Jorge
168 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Equilease Corp. v. Clifford
251 So. 2d 40 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 So. 2d 648, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-upson-fladistctapp-1977.