Equilease Corp. v. Clifford

251 So. 2d 40, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6112
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 1971
DocketNo. 71-438
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 251 So. 2d 40 (Equilease Corp. v. Clifford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Equilease Corp. v. Clifford, 251 So. 2d 40, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6112 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

BARKDULL, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks interlocutory review of an order of the trial court transferring venue of the cause to the Circuit Court, First Judicial Circuit in and for Escambia County, Florida. The action in the trial court sought damages for breach of a lease. The order reads in part as follows:

“This Court finds that the Defendant is a resident of Escambia County, Florida, and has a right under Florida Statute 47.011, F.S.A. to be sued in the County where he resides, and therefore the Defendant’s Motion to transfer be and the same is hereby granted.”

* ‡ * * ‡

This is error. The plaintiff has the option to choose the forum; not the de[41]*41fendant. And, if the cause of action arises in Dade County, he has a right to elect to proceed in the courts of said County. See: Greyhound Corporation v. Rosart, Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 708, wherein the following is found:

“In Florida, the election of venue is with the plaintiff and although it may be more convenient to the defendant and possibly to the plaintiff that the action be prosecuted in another county or circuit, nevertheless, if the election is one which the plaintiff has properly exercised under the statute, then the election still remains his and not one which can be dictated by the defendant. * * * To hold otherwise would be to nullify the venue statute which gives the plaintiff the right to file his action in a particular place under certain specified conditions.”
>{« >Ji j{s i(i

Therefore, the order here under review be and the same is hereby reversed with directions to proceed with the matter.1

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Upson
343 So. 2d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Central Bank of North Dade v. Prime Land Development Corp.
335 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Warren Bros. Co. v. Joslin
338 So. 2d 855 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 So. 2d 40, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equilease-corp-v-clifford-fladistctapp-1971.