Marshall v. State

264 Ark. 34
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 29, 1979
DocketCR 78-199
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 264 Ark. 34 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marshall v. State, 264 Ark. 34 (Ark. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s motion for consideration of the record on a prior appeal in this case is granted even though it is a useless motion. Rule 9 (d) of the rules of this court clearly provides: “On a second or subsequent appeal, the abstract shall include a condensation of all pertinent portions of the record filed on any prior appeal.”

The purpose of the entry of this order is to call the attention of the bar to the fact that such motions are unnecessary.

Printer’s Note: The opinion on consideration of this case appears in 265 Ark. 302, 578 S.W. 2d 32.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. McCord
957 S.W.2d 190 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1997)
Johnson & Johnson v. First National Bank
594 S.W.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 Ark. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-ark-1979.