Marshall v. State
884 So. 2d 907, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14, 2004 WL 178588
Opinion
On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court
In accordance with the judgment of the Alabama Supreme Court, we dismiss the petitioner’s appeal. The proper vehicle for the petitioner’s claims is a petition for a writ of mandamus, not a petition filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P. See [908] Marshall v. State, 884 So.2d 900 (Ala.2003).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marshall v. State, 884 So. 2d 907, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14, 2004 WL 178588 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).
884 So. 2d 907 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marshall v. State
884 So. 2d 900 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)