Marshall v. State
884 So. 2d 907, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14, 2004 WL 178588
This text of 884 So. 2d 907 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marshall v. State, 884 So. 2d 907, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14, 2004 WL 178588 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court
In accordance with the judgment of the Alabama Supreme Court, we dismiss the petitioner’s appeal. The proper vehicle for the petitioner’s claims is a petition for a writ of mandamus, not a petition filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P. See [908]*908Marshall v. State, 884 So.2d 900 (Ala.2003).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marshall v. State
884 So. 2d 900 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 907, 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14, 2004 WL 178588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-alacrimapp-2004.