Marshall v. Hayward
This text of 67 A.D. 137 (Marshall v. Hayward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This purports to be a controversy submitted pursuant to section 1279 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure. We are asked for our opinion upon three formulated questions, but we are not authorized to direct judgment upon the determination of them. Until the parties stipulate that a judgment may be directed herein and also what the nature of the judgment shall be, in view of the contentions of the respective parties, we cannot exercise any jurisdiction in the matter.
Present — Goodrich, P. J., Bartlett, Hirschberg, Jerks and Sewell, JJ.
Proceedings dismissed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A.D. 137, 73 N.Y.S. 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-hayward-nyappdiv-1901.