Denver Tramway Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.

180 A.D. 433, 167 N.Y.S. 750, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8167

This text of 180 A.D. 433 (Denver Tramway Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denver Tramway Co. v. Bankers Trust Co., 180 A.D. 433, 167 N.Y.S. 750, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Page, J.:

The parties to this submission desire the construction of a mortgage or trust deed under which certain bonds have been issued.

The submission provides: None of the admissions herein contained are in anywise to affect either party, or to be regarded as made, except for the purpose of this submission.” A statement is made that a difference of opinion has arisen as to the construction of the mortgage or trust deed. The [434]*434final clause of the submission asks on behalf of the plaintiff that the court find and declare that the proper construction and meaning of the words in the mortgage is in accordance with its contention and that judgment be entered in favor of the plaintiff on said finding, together with the costs, and defendant prays that the court find and declare the proper construction and meaning of the mortgage to be in accordance with its contention, and that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant on such finding. This is entirely insufficient, as the controversy should be one that might have been the subject of an action upon which a judgment could be entered and the submission must state the kind of judgment to be entered. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1279.) In this case the judgment asked for is merely declaratory and does not grant any relief mandatory or prohibitory. (Marshall v. Hayward, 67 App. Div. 137.) It is no part of the duty of this court to advise attorneys as to the construction of documents, but only when the controversy arises out of some act done or threatened, which the court would relieve a party from or prevent.

The submission should be dismissed.

Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling and Shearn, JJ., concurred.

Submission dismissed. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Hayward
67 A.D. 137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 A.D. 433, 167 N.Y.S. 750, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denver-tramway-co-v-bankers-trust-co-nyappdiv-1917.