Marshall Et Al. v. Ohio; And Kensinger v. Ohio
This text of 419 U.S. 1062 (Marshall Et Al. v. Ohio; And Kensinger v. Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appeals from Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County. Stays (Nos. A-1282 and A-1283) heretofore granted on July 9, 1974, by Mr. Justice Stewart are vacated. Appeals dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would note probable jurisdiction and summarily reverse the judgments.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 U.S. 1062, 95 S. Ct. 648, 42 L. Ed. 2d 660, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 1685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-et-al-v-ohio-and-kensinger-v-ohio-scotus-1974.