Marshall Et Al. v. Ohio; And Kensinger v. Ohio

419 U.S. 1062, 95 S. Ct. 648, 42 L. Ed. 2d 660, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 1685
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 16, 1974·No. 74-225; 74-226·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Appeals from Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County. Stays (Nos. A-1282 and A-1283) heretofore granted on July 9, 1974, by Mr. Justice Stewart are vacated. Appeals dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would note probable jurisdiction and summarily reverse the judgments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall Et Al. v. Ohio; And Kensinger v. Ohio, 419 U.S. 1062, 95 S. Ct. 648, 42 L. Ed. 2d 660, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 1685 (1974).

419 U.S. 1062 (Marshall Et Al. v. Ohio; And Kensinger v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schick v. Reed
420 U.S. 939 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Marshall Et Al. v. Ohio; And Kensinger v. Ohio
419 U.S. 1062 (Supreme Court, 1974)