Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC

Ninth Circuit

Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC

882 F.3d 777

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 2018

DocketNo. 15-15791; No. 15-15794; No. 15-16561; No. 15-16659; No. 16-15003; No. 16-15004; No. 16-15005; No. 16-15118; No. 16-16033

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 882 F.3d 777 (Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC, 882 F.3d 777 (9th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

*778Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

*778Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

882 F.3d 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsh-v-j-alexanders-llc-ca9-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack