Marsalona v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marsalona v. Coombe

234 A.D.2d 841, 651 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12584

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 234 A.D.2d 841 (Marsalona v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marsalona v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 841, 651 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered May 9, 1996 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Petitioner, an inmate at Ulster Correctional Facility in Ulster County, commenced this proceeding challenging a determination of respondents which denied his application to participate in a temporary work release program. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction arising out of petitioner’s failure to serve the named respondents and file proof of service within the time requirements set forth in the order to show cause authorizing service by mail. While procedural requirements may be relaxed in cases where "imprisonment presents obstacles to service that are beyond an inmate’s power to control” (Matter of Hoyer v Coughlin, 179 AD2d 921), jurisdiction is not obtained in cases where the procedural requirements that could have been satisfied have not been (see, supra). We deem that to have been the case in this matter and we accordingly affirm Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing the petition.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered May 9, 1996 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Petitioner, an inmate at Ulster Correctional Facility in Ulster County, commenced this proceeding challenging a determination of respondents which denied his application to participate in a temporary work release program. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction arising out of petitioner’s failure to serve the named respondents and file proof of service within the time requirements set forth in the order to show cause authorizing service by mail. While procedural requirements may be relaxed in cases where "imprisonment presents obstacles to service that are beyond an inmate’s power to control” (Matter of Hoyer v Coughlin, 179 AD2d 921), jurisdiction is not obtained in cases where the procedural requirements that could have been satisfied have not been (see, supra). We deem that to have been the case in this matter and we accordingly affirm Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing the petition.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D.2d 841, 651 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marsalona-v-coombe-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack