Arroyo v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arroyo v. Coombe

239 A.D.2d 634, 657 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4531

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 239 A.D.2d 634 (Arroyo v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arroyo v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 634, 657 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Carpinello, J.), entered April 26, 1996 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Petitioner failed to acquire personal jurisdiction over respondents when he failed to serve the signed order to show cause upon respondents and the Attorney-General as directed therein (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [8]; see also, Matter of Marsalona v Coombe, 234 AD2d 841; Matter of Alevras v Chairman of New York State Bd. of Parole, 118 AD2d 1020, 1021, appeal dismissed 68 NY2d 753). Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing the petition is, accordingly, affirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Carpinello, J.), entered April 26, 1996 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Petitioner failed to acquire personal jurisdiction over respondents when he failed to serve the signed order to show cause upon respondents and the Attorney-General as directed therein (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [8]; see also, Matter of Marsalona v Coombe, 234 AD2d 841; Matter of Alevras v Chairman of New York State Bd. of Parole, 118 AD2d 1020, 1021, appeal dismissed 68 NY2d 753). Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing the petition is, accordingly, affirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 634, 657 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arroyo-v-coombe-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack