Marrick v. Furnari

211 N.W. 667, 237 Mich. 239, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 780

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 22, 1925·No. Docket No. 46.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON REHEARING. The facts are stated sufficiently in Marrick v. Furnari,233 Mich. 146. The case is ruled by Goldstick v. Thomas, ante, 236.

Accordingly, the decree of the trial court, dismissing the bill, is affirmed, with costs to appellees.

SHARPE, C.J., and BIRD, SNOW, STEERE, WIEST, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred.

Justice FELLOWS took no part in this decision. *Page 240

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marrick v. Furnari, 211 N.W. 667, 237 Mich. 239, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 780 (Mich. 1925).

Pincite

211 N.W. 667 (Marrick v. Furnari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

137 Wash. App. 665 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2007)

151 P.3d 1038 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2007)

451 P.2d 675 (Washington Supreme Court, 1969)