Marrick v. Furnari

211 N.W. 667, 237 Mich. 239, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 780
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 22, 1925
DocketDocket No. 46.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 211 N.W. 667 (Marrick v. Furnari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marrick v. Furnari, 211 N.W. 667, 237 Mich. 239, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 780 (Mich. 1925).

Opinion

ON REHEARING.
The facts are stated sufficiently in Marrick v. Furnari,233 Mich. 146. The case is ruled by Goldstick v. Thomas, ante, 236.

Accordingly, the decree of the trial court, dismissing the bill, is affirmed, with costs to appellees.

SHARPE, C.J., and BIRD, SNOW, STEERE, WIEST, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred.

Justice FELLOWS took no part in this decision. *Page 240

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.
137 Wash. App. 665 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2007)
Green v. Normandy Park
151 P.3d 1038 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2007)
Weld v. Bjork
451 P.2d 675 (Washington Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 N.W. 667, 237 Mich. 239, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marrick-v-furnari-mich-1925.