Marrero v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marrero v. City of New York

275 A.D.2d 304, 712 N.Y.S.2d 406, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8547

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 7, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 304 (Marrero v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marrero v. City of New York, 275 A.D.2d 304, 712 N.Y.S.2d 406, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, [305]*305J.), dated October 1, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff Jacqueline Rodriguez Marrero, a New York City police officer, was allegedly injured while on duty on September 22, 1992. The plaintiffs commenced this action on December 22, 1994, pursuant to the revival provisions of General Municipal Law § 205-e, as amended in 1994. By their terms, the revival provisions of the 1994 amendment to General Municipal Law § 205-e apply to the instant action, which was “commenced on or before [June 30, 1995]” (Schiavone v City of New York, 92 NY2d 308, 314; Giblin v City of New York, 267 AD2d 127; see also, Dittrich v West 107th St. Assocs., 205 AD2d 313). Thompson, J. P., S. Miller, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, [305]*305J.), dated October 1, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff Jacqueline Rodriguez Marrero, a New York City police officer, was allegedly injured while on duty on September 22, 1992. The plaintiffs commenced this action on December 22, 1994, pursuant to the revival provisions of General Municipal Law § 205-e, as amended in 1994. By their terms, the revival provisions of the 1994 amendment to General Municipal Law § 205-e apply to the instant action, which was “commenced on or before [June 30, 1995]” (Schiavone v City of New York, 92 NY2d 308, 314; Giblin v City of New York, 267 AD2d 127; see also, Dittrich v West 107th St. Assocs., 205 AD2d 313). Thompson, J. P., S. Miller, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 304, 712 N.Y.S.2d 406, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marrero-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack