Marr v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1376
JASON A. MARR,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
OLIVIA M. SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00057-FMS)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Olivia M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Melinda Faith Seemar, STALLINGS & BISCHOFF, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Olivia M. Smith appeals the district court’s order
remanding the civil action against her to state court for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. The district court’s remand order is
not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000). Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marr v. Smith (Marr v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.