Marr v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Marr v. Smith

235 F. App'x 73

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2007·No. No. 07-1376·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Olivia M. Smith appeals the district court’s order remanding the civil action against her to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court’s remand order is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Olivia M. Smith appeals the district court’s order remanding the civil action against her to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court’s remand order is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Marr v. Smith, 235 F. App'x 73 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

235 F. App'x 73 (Marr v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related