Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Marquette v. State

Marquette v. State

693 So. 2d 125, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4987, 1997 WL 240939
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 12, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1787
StatusPublished

This text of 693 So. 2d 125 (Marquette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marquette v. State, 693 So. 2d 125, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4987, 1997 WL 240939 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Marquette appeals summary denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Appellee moves for a relinquishment of jurisdiction, conceding that the record is insufficient to support the trial court’s disposition. We believe the appropriate course is to treat this motion as confessing error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the order appealed with directions to issue an order to show cause and to conduct such other proceedings as may be appropriate and necessary. Hudson v. Singletary, 614 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson v. Singletary
614 So. 2d 13 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 So. 2d 125, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4987, 1997 WL 240939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marquette-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.