Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hudson v. Singletary

Hudson v. Singletary

614 So. 2d 13, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1906, 1993 WL 35260
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2140
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 614 So. 2d 13 (Hudson v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. Singletary, 614 So. 2d 13, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1906, 1993 WL 35260 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Theron G. Hudson appeals summary denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. Appellee moves for a relinquishment of jurisdiction, conceding that the record is insufficient to support the trial court’s disposition. We believe the appropriate course is to treat this motion as confessing error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the order appealed with directions to issue an order to show cause and to conduct such other proceedings as may be appropriate and necessary.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

. JOANOS, C.J., and ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marquette v. State
693 So. 2d 125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 13, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1906, 1993 WL 35260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1993.