Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District
This text of 586 N.E.2d 55 (Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Judge Alexander dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820, 820-822).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
586 N.E.2d 55, 78 N.Y.2d 1096, 578 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlowe-v-rush-henrietta-central-school-district-ny-1991.