Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District
586 N.E.2d 55, 78 N.Y.2d 1096, 578 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4800
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Judge Alexander dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820, 820-822).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District, 586 N.E.2d 55, 78 N.Y.2d 1096, 578 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4800 (N.Y. 1991).
586 N.E.2d 55 (Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marlowe v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENT. SCH. DIST.
78 N.Y.2d 1096 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)