Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District

586 N.E.2d 55, 78 N.Y.2d 1096, 578 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4800
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 21, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 586 N.E.2d 55 (Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marlowe v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District, 586 N.E.2d 55, 78 N.Y.2d 1096, 578 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4800 (N.Y. 1991).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Judge Alexander dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820, 820-822).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marlowe v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENT. SCH. DIST.
78 N.Y.2d 1096 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
586 N.E.2d 55, 78 N.Y.2d 1096, 578 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marlowe-v-rush-henrietta-central-school-district-ny-1991.