Marlowe v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENT. SCH. DIST.

78 N.Y.2d 1096
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

78 N.Y.2d 1096 (1991)

Steven M. Marlowe, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Steven L. Marlowe, et al., Appellants,
v.
Rush-Henrietta Central School District et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 8, 1991.
Decided November 21, 1991.

George A. Schell for appellants.

James E. Maslyn for Rush-Henrietta Central School District, respondent.

David F. Bowen, Robert M. Shaddock and Roger G. Preston, Jr., for Derrick Nesmith, respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA. Judge ALEXANDER dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820, 820-822).

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marlowe v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENT. SCH. DIST., 78 N.Y.2d 1096 (N.Y. 1991).

78 N.Y.2d 1096 (Marlowe v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENT. SCH. DIST.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaiser v. Lakeshore Youth Soccer Ass'n
6 A.D.3d 1160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)