Market Bank v. Hartshorne
3 Abb. Ct. App. 173
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Market Bank v. Hartshorne. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 Keyes 137 →
Opinion
By the Court.
The check was received by the Market Bank in the usual course of business, before dishonor and without notice of fraud in its origin. On the faith of its validity, it was credited as cash in the account of Abbatt & Minturn, the payees, and on the same day the bank honored their checks for the amount. The plaintiff’s title is unimpeached, and the judgment should be affirmed.
All the judges concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Market Bank v. Hartshorne, 3 Abb. Ct. App. 173 (N.Y. 1866).
3 Abb. Ct. App. 173 (Market Bank v. Hartshorne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.