Market Bank v. Hartshorne

3 Keyes 137
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Porter, J.

The check was received by the Market Bank in the usual course of business, before dishonor and without notice of fraud in its origin. On the faith of its validity, it was credited as cash in the account of Abbott & Minturn, the payees, and on the same day the bank honored their checks for the amount. The plaintiff’s title is unimpeached, and the judgment should be affirmed.

All the judges concurring,

- Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Market Bank v. Hartshorne, 3 Keyes 137 (N.Y. 1866).

3 Keyes 137 (Market Bank v. Hartshorne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Justh v. National Bank of Commonwealth
45 How. Pr. 492 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1873)