Market Bank v. Hartshorne

New York Court of Appeals

Market Bank v. Hartshorne

3 Keyes 137

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 15, 1866

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Keyes 137 (Market Bank v. Hartshorne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Market Bank v. Hartshorne, 3 Keyes 137 (N.Y. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Porter, J.

The check was received by the Market Bank in the usual course of business, before dishonor and without notice of fraud in its origin. On the faith of its validity, it was credited as cash in the account of Abbott & Minturn, the payees, and on the same day the bank honored their checks for the amount. The plaintiff’s title is unimpeached, and the judgment should be affirmed.

All the judges concurring,

- Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter, J.

The check was received by the Market Bank in the usual course of business, before dishonor and without notice of fraud in its origin. On the faith of its validity, it was credited as cash in the account of Abbott & Minturn, the payees, and on the same day the bank honored their checks for the amount. The plaintiff’s title is unimpeached, and the judgment should be affirmed.

All the judges concurring,

- Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Keyes 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/market-bank-v-hartshorne-ny-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack