Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: June 14, 2024
• Docket: 24-11523
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-11523 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 06/14/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11523 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

MARK T. STINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, d.b.a. Mr. Cooper,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-24741-RKA USCA11 Case: 24-11523 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 06/14/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11523

Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Mark Stinson appeals from the district court’s order transfer- ring his case to the Western District of Tennessee, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), but that order is interlocutory and not immedi- ately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Stelly v. Emps. Nat’l Ins. Co., 431 F.2d 1251, 1253 (5th Cir. 1970) (holding that an order trans- ferring a case under § 1406(a) is interlocutory and non-appealable); Middlebrooks v. Smith, 735 F.2d 431, 432-33 (11th Cir. 1984) (explain- ing that a transfer order is not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.