Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: September 23, 2024
• Docket: 24-12685
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-12685 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 09/23/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12685 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

MARK T. STINSON, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHN T FOWLKES, Federal Judge, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Memphis, TN,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12685 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 09/23/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-12685

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:24-cv-22833-DMM ____________________

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Mark Stinson appeals from the district court’s order transfer- ring his case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because transfer orders under § 1406(a) are non-appealable interlocutory orders. See Middlebrooks v. Smith, 735 F.2d 431, 432 (11th Cir. 1984); Stelly v. Emps. Nat’l Ins. Co., 431 F.2d 1251, 1253-54 (5th Cir. 1970). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.