Mark G. Weinberg v. City of Chicago

320 F.3d 682, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2963, 2003 WL 355947
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 19, 2003·No. 02-1372·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

[683]*683ORDER

On December 4, 2002, defendant-appel-lee filed a petition for rehearing en bane and on December 19, 2002, plaintiff-appellant filed an answer, and on December 26, 2002, defendant-appellee filed a reply in support of the petition for rehearing. A vote of the panel and active members of the court was requested, and a majority of the judges voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.

Judge Easterbrook dissented in an opinion joined by Judges Coffey and Manion, which follows. Judge Ripple voted to grant rehearing en banc but did not join in the dissent.

The petition for rehearing en banc is therefore Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark G. Weinberg v. City of Chicago, 320 F.3d 682, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2963, 2003 WL 355947 (7th Cir. 2003).

320 F.3d 682 (Mark G. Weinberg v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Left Field Media LLC v. City of Chicago
822 F.3d 988 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Mark G. Weinberg v. City of Chicago
320 F.3d 682 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)