Mark G. Weinberg v. City of Chicago
This text of 320 F.3d 682 (Mark G. Weinberg v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[683]*683ORDER
On December 4, 2002, defendant-appel-lee filed a petition for rehearing en bane and on December 19, 2002, plaintiff-appellant filed an answer, and on December 26, 2002, defendant-appellee filed a reply in support of the petition for rehearing. A vote of the panel and active members of the court was requested, and a majority of the judges voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.
Judge Easterbrook dissented in an opinion joined by Judges Coffey and Manion, which follows. Judge Ripple voted to grant rehearing en banc but did not join in the dissent.
The petition for rehearing en banc is therefore Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F.3d 682, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2963, 2003 WL 355947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-g-weinberg-v-city-of-chicago-ca7-2003.