Mark-Christopher Johnson v. Virginia Department of Taxation

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 2025
Docket25-1859
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mark-Christopher Johnson v. Virginia Department of Taxation (Mark-Christopher Johnson v. Virginia Department of Taxation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark-Christopher Johnson v. Virginia Department of Taxation, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1859 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1859

MARK-CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jamar Kentrell Walker, District Judge. (4:24-cv-00113-JKW-LRL)

Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark-Christopher Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1859 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Mark-Christopher Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil

action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and discern no

reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district court’s order, Johnson v. Va. Dep’t

of Tax’n, No. 4:24-cv-00113-JKW-LRL (E.D. Va. July 14, 2025), to reflect dismissal of

Johnson’s claims without prejudice, see S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n v.

OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC, 713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013) (noting that court

lacking “jurisdiction has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits”), and

affirm the order as modified, see 28 U.S.C. § 2106. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mark-Christopher Johnson v. Virginia Department of Taxation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-christopher-johnson-v-virginia-department-of-taxation-ca4-2025.