MARK CHABAN, PC v. Getsinger

Michigan Supreme Court

MARK CHABAN, PC v. Getsinger

767 N.W.2d 430, 483 Mich. 1092

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 23, 2009

Docket136752 and 136753

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 767 N.W.2d 430 (MARK CHABAN, PC v. Getsinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MARK CHABAN, PC v. Getsinger, 767 N.W.2d 430, 483 Mich. 1092 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinions

On order of the Court, the motion to intervene as appellant is granted. The application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2008, orders of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of its May 14, 2008, orders to afford Tindall & Company EC. the opportunity to present arguments in support of the portions of the probate court’s March 6, 2006, and March 8, 2006, orders awarding sanctions that were vacated by the Court of Appeals’ May 14, 2008, order in No. 282481. We do not retain jurisdiction. Court of Appeals Nos. 282109 and 282481.

Corrigan, J. I am not participating in this case because I retained defendant Joseph E Buttiglieri to represent my husband’s estate in probate court and on other matters.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Court, the motion to intervene as appellant is granted. The application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2008, orders of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of its May 14, 2008, orders to afford Tindall & Company EC. the opportunity to present arguments in support of the portions of the probate court’s March 6, 2006, and March 8, 2006, orders awarding sanctions that were vacated by the Court of Appeals’ May 14, 2008, order in No. 282481. We do not retain jurisdiction. Court of Appeals Nos. 282109 and 282481.

Corrigan, J. I am not participating in this case because I retained defendant Joseph E Buttiglieri to represent my husband’s estate in probate court and on other matters.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 N.W.2d 430, 483 Mich. 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-chaban-pc-v-getsinger-mich-2009.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack