Mark Anthony Castillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 17, 2014·No. 01-12-01046-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-01046-CR Style: Mark Anthony Castillo v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: November 25, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to compel counsel to provide appellant with copy of transcript Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  No further extensions of time will be granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant moves the Court to compel counsel to provide him with a written copy of the record in this case. A copy of the record has previously been sent to appellant, and appellant has now filed an Anders response. Accordingly, the motion is dismissed as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack  Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: January 17, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark Anthony Castillo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Mark Anthony Castillo v. State (Mark Anthony Castillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.