Mark Anthony Castillo v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-12-01046-CR Style: Mark Anthony Castillo v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: November 25, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to compel counsel to provide appellant with copy of transcript Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: No further extensions of time will be granted Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellant moves the Court to compel counsel to provide him with a written copy of the record in this case. A copy of the record has previously been sent to appellant, and appellant has now filed an Anders response. Accordingly, the motion is dismissed as moot.
Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: January 17, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mark Anthony Castillo v. State (Mark Anthony Castillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.