Mark Anthony Castillo v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-12-01046-CR Style: Mark Anthony Castillo v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: November 14, 2013 Type of motion: Motion for extension to file Anders response Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Anders response
If motion to extend time: Original due date: December 2, 2013 Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: December 2, 2013 Date Requested: March 27, 2014
Ordered that motion is:
Granted in part If document is to be filed, document due: January 31, 2013 No further extensions of time will be granted Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ We direct the Clerk of this Court to provide appellant with a copy of the appellate record in this case. We further grant in part Appellant’s request for an extension of time to file his Anders response and ORDER that his response be filed no later than January 31, 2014. All other relief requested in the motion is denied.
Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: November 21, 2013 November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mark Anthony Castillo v. State (Mark Anthony Castillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.