Maritime Ventures, LLC v. City of Norwalk

861 A.2d 514, 271 Conn. 943, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 586
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 4, 2004·No. SC 17302·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the plaintiffs, Maritime Ventures, LLC, and Maritime Motors, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 38 (AC 24638), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s decision permitting the taking of nonsubstandard property within a development area by a redevelopment agency because the use of the property failed to conform to uses permitted under the plan?

“2. Under the facts of this case, did the Appellate Court properly determine that a new finding of blight was unnecessary in adopting the 1998 revised Reed Putnam urban renewal plan?”

SULLIVAN, C. J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maritime Ventures, LLC v. City of Norwalk, 861 A.2d 514, 271 Conn. 943, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 586 (Colo. 2004).

861 A.2d 514 (Maritime Ventures, LLC v. City of Norwalk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maritime Ventures, LLC v. City of Norwalk
894 A.2d 946 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)
Williams v. Black Rock Yacht Club, Inc.
877 A.2d 849 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)