Marion James Johnson v. United States

304 F.2d 760
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 13, 1962
Docket18933
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 304 F.2d 760 (Marion James Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marion James Johnson v. United States, 304 F.2d 760 (5th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the entire record in this case makes it abundantly clear that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of guilty when tested by the requirement of proof in perjury cases. Cuesta v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 704; McWhorter v. United States, 5 Cir., 1952, 193 F.2d 982. Cf. United States v. Wood, 1840, 14 Pet. 430, 10 L.Ed. 527; United States v. Goldberg, 2 Cir., 1961, 290 F.2d 729; and Arena v. United States, 9 Cir., 1955, 226 F.2d 227.

The other assignments of error are equally without merit. Williams v. United States, 5 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 656 (amendment to indictment); Todisco v. United States, 9 Cir., 1961, 298 F.2d 208, and Monroe v. United States, 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 234 F.2d 49 (admissibility of recording of conversation with appellant); Greenhill v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 298 F.2d 405, and Shushan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1941, 117 F.2d 110, 133 A.L.R. 1040, (conduct of prosecutor).

The verdict of conviction being amply supported and no prejudicial error appearing we must and do AFFIRM the appeal from the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Commissioner
1965 T.C. Memo. 275 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 F.2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-james-johnson-v-united-states-ca5-1962.