Marion Harger v. MO Board of Probation & Parole

407 F. App'x 79
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 2011
Docket10-2372
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 407 F. App'x 79 (Marion Harger v. MO Board of Probation & Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marion Harger v. MO Board of Probation & Parole, 407 F. App'x 79 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Marion Harger appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. After careful de novo review, see *80 Blankenship v. USA Truck, Inc., 601 F.3d 852, 853 (8th Cir.2010), we agree with the district court that Harger failed to allege a constitutional violation. He has no liberty interest in parole, see Adams v. Agniel, 405 F.3d 643, 645 (8th Cir.2005), and he failed to show that application of the 2008 Missouri parole statutes and regulations, instead of those in effect in 1988 when his offenses were committed, resulted in either an Ex Post Facto Clause or Equal Protection Clause violation. See Nolan v. Thompson, 521 F.3d 983, 987-90 (8th Cir.2008); McCall v. Delo, 41 F.3d 1219, 1221 (8th Cir.1994).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F. App'x 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-harger-v-mo-board-of-probation-parole-ca8-2011.