Mario Gonzalez-Rivera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

37 F.3d 1421, 94 Daily Journal DAR 14732, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7951, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29082
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mario Gonzalez-Rivera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 F.3d 1441
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 19, 1994·No. 92-70492·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Judges Tang and D.W. Nelson voted to deny respondent’s petition for rehearing and reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge Choy voted to grant the petition for rehearing and recommended granting the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R.App.P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mario Gonzalez-Rivera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 37 F.3d 1421, 94 Daily Journal DAR 14732, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7951, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29082 (9th Cir. 1994).

37 F.3d 1421 (Mario Gonzalez-Rivera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jerry Nachtigal
37 F.3d 1421 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)