Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Marino v. Wallace

Marino v. Wallace

65 A.D.2d 946, 410 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13872
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1978·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm because in our view the allegedly slanderous remarks were made during the course of a Public Service Commission hearing which was in substance a quasi-judicial proceeding to which an absolute privilege attaches (Julian J. Studley, Inc. v Lefrak, 50 AD2d 162, affd on other grounds 41 NY2d 881; see Toker v Pollak, 44 NY2d 211, 222; Wiener v Weintraub, 22 NY2d 330; Andrews v Gardiner, 224 NY 440 446-447). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — summary judgment.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marino v. Wallace, 65 A.D.2d 946, 410 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

65 A.D.2d 946 (Marino v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Desalvatore v. Washburn
192 Misc. 2d 321 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Stilsing Electric, Inc. v. Joyce
113 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Missick v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc.
115 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Jafar v. Blue Cross Blue Shield
129 Misc. 2d 584 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)
Weissman v. Mogol
118 Misc. 2d 911 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Park Knoll Associates v. Schmidt
89 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)