Marine Midland Bank v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
This text of 127 A.D.2d 1000 (Marine Midland Bank v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: In view of our determination that the charitable remaindermen are entitled to summary judgment (see, Matter of Herrmann [appeal No. 1], 127 AD2d 999), there is no basis for the summary removal of counsel for the charitable remaindermen since there is no risk of their attorney being called as a witness (Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-102). (Appeal from order of Erie County Surrogate’s Court, Mattina, S. — disqualify law firm.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A.D.2d 1000, 512 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-midland-bank-v-marine-midland-bank-n-a-nyappdiv-1987.