Marine Midland Bank-Central v. Gleason

New York Court of Appeals

Marine Midland Bank-Central v. Gleason

391 N.E.2d 294, 47 N.Y.2d 758, 417 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2028

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 1, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 391 N.E.2d 294 (Marine Midland Bank-Central v. Gleason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marine Midland Bank-Central v. Gleason, 391 N.E.2d 294, 47 N.Y.2d 758, 417 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2028 (N.Y. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Although we agree with the result reached below, we take this occasion to clarify the procedural steps necessary to convert a State tax warrant into a perfected lien upon the property of a delinquent taxpayer. Subdivision (b) of section 1141 of the Tax Law provides that upon docketing of a tax warrant with the county clerk "the amount of such warrant so docketed shall become a lien upon the title to and interest in real and personal property of the person against whom the warrant is issued.”

We interpret this express language to grant the State a perfected lien upon the filing of a tax warrant without the further necessity of a levy. In so holding, we reject the [761]*761conclusion reached by the Appellate Division that State tax liens, although perfected upon docketing, may be extinguished if a levy is not made within the lifetime of a judgment execution. (See CPLR 5230, subd [c].) In our view, the fact that subdivision (b) of section 1141 authorizes the Sheriff to proceed upon a docketed tax warrant in the same manner as executions issued against property of a judgment debtor refers only to enforcement, as distinguished from perfection of the lien. (See Matter of United Casket Co., 449 F Supp 261, 263-264; cf. Matter of Thriftway Auto Rental Corp., 457 F2d 409, 411-412; Corrigan v United States Fire Ins. Co., 427 F Supp 940, 942-943.) It follows from this analysis that all three State tax warrants constituted perfected liens having priority over respondent’s security interest. Thus, independent of the Federal tax lien, respondent’s collateral was impaired in an amount sufficient to justify the recovery below.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Although we agree with the result reached below, we take this occasion to clarify the procedural steps necessary to convert a State tax warrant into a perfected lien upon the property of a delinquent taxpayer. Subdivision (b) of section 1141 of the Tax Law provides that upon docketing of a tax warrant with the county clerk "the amount of such warrant so docketed shall become a lien upon the title to and interest in real and personal property of the person against whom the warrant is issued.”

We interpret this express language to grant the State a perfected lien upon the filing of a tax warrant without the further necessity of a levy. In so holding, we reject the [761]*761conclusion reached by the Appellate Division that State tax liens, although perfected upon docketing, may be extinguished if a levy is not made within the lifetime of a judgment execution. (See CPLR 5230, subd [c].) In our view, the fact that subdivision (b) of section 1141 authorizes the Sheriff to proceed upon a docketed tax warrant in the same manner as executions issued against property of a judgment debtor refers only to enforcement, as distinguished from perfection of the lien. (See Matter of United Casket Co., 449 F Supp 261, 263-264; cf. Matter of Thriftway Auto Rental Corp., 457 F2d 409, 411-412; Corrigan v United States Fire Ins. Co., 427 F Supp 940, 942-943.) It follows from this analysis that all three State tax warrants constituted perfected liens having priority over respondent’s security interest. Thus, independent of the Federal tax lien, respondent’s collateral was impaired in an amount sufficient to justify the recovery below.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 N.E.2d 294, 47 N.Y.2d 758, 417 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marine-midland-bank-central-v-gleason-ny-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack