Maric v. Adams

Ohio Supreme Court

Maric v. Adams

2001 Ohio 154, 92 Ohio St. 3d 209

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 5, 2001

Docket2000-0874, 2000-1148

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 154 (Maric v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maric v. Adams, 2001 Ohio 154, 92 Ohio St. 3d 209 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 209.]

MARIC ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ADAMS ET AL.; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Maric v. Adams, 2001-Ohio-154.] Insurance—Motor vehicles—Mandatory offering of uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Subrogation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth and Clark v. Scarpelli. (Nos. 00-874 and 00-1148—Submitted May 16, 2001—Decided July 5, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 98-L-142. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur in judgment. __________________ COOK, J., concurring in judgment. {¶ 2} I concur in judgment based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concur in the foregoing opinion. __________________ Robert P. Rutter, for appellants. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Davis & Young Co., L.P.A., Henry A. Hentemann and J. Michael Creagan, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 209.]

MARIC ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ADAMS ET AL.; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Maric v. Adams, 2001-Ohio-154.] Insurance—Motor vehicles—Mandatory offering of uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Subrogation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth and Clark v. Scarpelli. (Nos. 00-874 and 00-1148—Submitted May 16, 2001—Decided July 5, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 98-L-142. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur in judgment. __________________ COOK, J., concurring in judgment. {¶ 2} I concur in judgment based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concur in the foregoing opinion. __________________ Robert P. Rutter, for appellants. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Davis & Young Co., L.P.A., Henry A. Hentemann and J. Michael Creagan, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 154, 92 Ohio St. 3d 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maric-v-adams-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack