Marianne Huff v. Lynne Doyle
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 1, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161976 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh
MARIANNE HUFF and PERSON-CENTERED Elizabeth M. Welch, ADVOCACY SERVICES, LLC, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v SC: 161976 COA: 349528 Ottawa CC: 18-005222-NZ
LYNNE DOYLE, STACY COLEMAN-AX, and JEFFREY L. BROWN, Defendants-Appellees,
and DOUGLAS VAN ESSEN, COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH OF OTTAWA COUNTY, and THE LAKESHORE REGIONAL ENTITY, Defendants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
June 1, 2021
t0524
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marianne Huff v. Lynne Doyle (Marianne Huff v. Lynne Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.