Marianne Huff v. Lynne Doyle
This text of Marianne Huff v. Lynne Doyle (Marianne Huff v. Lynne Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 16, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra 161976(46) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh MARIANNE HUFF and PERSON Elizabeth M. Welch, CENTERED ADVOCACY SERVICES, Justices
LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, SC: 161976 v COA: 349528 Ottawa CC: 18-005222-NZ LYNNE DOYLE, STACY COLEMAN-AX, and JEFFREY L. BROWN, Defendants-Appellees, and
DOUGLAS VAN ESSEN, COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH OF OTTAWA COUNTY, and THE LAKESHORE REGIONAL ENTITY, Defendants. ________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee Doyle to extend the time for filing her answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted on December 16, 2020, is accepted as timely filed.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 16, 2021
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marianne Huff v. Lynne Doyle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marianne-huff-v-lynne-doyle-mich-2021.