Marianna Blountstown Railroad Co. v. May

107 So. 646, 91 Fla. 259
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 6, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that the damages awarded to the defendant’s estate are excessive ; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Jones, 45 Fla. 407, 34 South. Rep. 246; Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Bowden, 54 Fla. 461, 45 South. Rep. 755; Secs. 4960, 4961, 4964, 4965, Rev. Gen Stats. 1920; it is, therefore, considered ordered and adjudged that if the plaintiff below shall remit $1,000.00 as of the date of the verdict, the judgment shall stand affirmed for the remainder, otherwise, the judgment will stand reversed for a new trial. Florida East Coast R. Co. v. Hayes, 67 Fla. 101, 64 South. Rep. 504; 84 Fla. 235, 93 So. 247; 20 Fla. 515.

It is so ordered.

Brown, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Strum, J. J., concur. Buford, J., of counsel for Defendant in Error, disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marianna Blountstown Railroad Co. v. May, 107 So. 646, 91 Fla. 259 (Fla. 1926).

107 So. 646 (Marianna Blountstown Railroad Co. v. May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLean v. Spratt
20 Fla. 515 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1884)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Jones
45 Fla. 407 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)
Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Bowden
54 Fla. 461 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Hayes
64 So. 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)
South Florida Farms Co. v. Stevenson
93 So. 247 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)