Marcy v. Larkin
132 A. 90, 99 N.J. Eq. 429, 14 Stock. 429, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 541
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For a-ffirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchabd, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marcy v. Larkin, 132 A. 90, 99 N.J. Eq. 429, 14 Stock. 429, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 541 (N.J. 1926).
132 A. 90 (Marcy v. Larkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WOODMONT PROPERTIES, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF WESTAMPTON (L-2494-18, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2022
Highland Lakes Country Club & Community Ass'n v. Franzino
892 A.2d 646 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2006)
PNC Bank v. Axelsson
860 A.2d 1021 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Camp Clearwater, Inc. v. Plock
146 A.2d 527 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Township of Woodbridge v. Pavel
66 A.2d 902 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)