Marcus A. Surrett v. United Auto Acceptance
This text of Marcus A. Surrett v. United Auto Acceptance (Marcus A. Surrett v. United Auto Acceptance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ August 26, 2014
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A14A2263. MARCUS A. SURRETT v. UNITED AUTO ACCEPTANCE.
United Auto Acceptance obtained a default judgment against Marcus Surrett. Surrett later moved for relief from the judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d). The trial court denied the motion, and Surrett filed this direct appeal. An appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) must be taken by application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8); Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). Surrett’s failure to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/26/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marcus A. Surrett v. United Auto Acceptance, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-a-surrett-v-united-auto-acceptance-gactapp-2014.