Marco Antonio Gonzales-Neyra v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

133 F.3d 726
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 6, 1998·No. 96-70467·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion filed on September 15, 1997 [122 F.3d 1293] is amended as follows:

The sentence at page 12060, lines 9-13 [122 F.3d at 1296], which reads:

“Because we conclude that Gonzales-Neyra established past persecution on account of his political opinion, we also hold that he was entitled to a rebuttable presumption that he had a well-founded fear that he would be similarly persecuted in the future.”

is replaced by:

“Regardless of whether Gonzales-Neyra established past persecution on account of his political opinion, he established a well-founded fear of future persecution.”

The Petition for Rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marco Antonio Gonzales-Neyra v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 133 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 1998).

133 F.3d 726 (Marco Antonio Gonzales-Neyra v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Argueta-Hernandez v. Holder
346 F. App'x 210 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Fofana v. Gonzales
138 F. App'x 909 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Garcia Perez v. Ashcroft
120 F. App'x 735 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Alba-Gomez v. Ashcroft
118 F. App'x 236 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Savkin v. Ashcroft
114 F. App'x 829 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Vilchez Zarate v. Ashcroft
118 F. App'x 129 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Rachdi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
15 F. App'x 524 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Abaya v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
2 F. App'x 850 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)