March v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

March v. State

748 So. 2d 367, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 182, 2000 WL 27556

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 12, 2000

DocketNo. 3D99-542

StatusPublished

This text of 748 So. 2d 367 (March v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

March v. State, 748 So. 2d 367, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 182, 2000 WL 27556 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal conclusively refutes the appellants’s argument that his [368]*368plea was not knowingly and voluntarily given and there has been no showing otherwise that a manifest injustice occurred. We therefore affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. See LeDuc v. State, 415 So.2d 721, 724 (Fla.1982); James v. State, 696 So.2d 1194, 1195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal conclusively refutes the appellants’s argument that his [368]*368plea was not knowingly and voluntarily given and there has been no showing otherwise that a manifest injustice occurred. We therefore affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. See LeDuc v. State, 415 So.2d 721, 724 (Fla.1982); James v. State, 696 So.2d 1194, 1195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

748 So. 2d 367, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 182, 2000 WL 27556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/march-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack