Marcel Pop v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Opinion
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
Submitted January 31, 2013∗ Decided February 19, 2013
Before
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge
DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
No. 12-3214 On Petition for Review of an MARCEL POP, Order from the Board of Petitioner, Immigration Appeals.
v. No. A071 030 710
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
Order
The petition for review is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Anaya-Aguilar v.
Holder, 683 F.3d 369 (7th Cir. 2012).
∗ This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marcel Pop v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Marcel Pop v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.