Maraman v. Cooper Steel Fabricators

562 S.E.2d 420, 355 N.C. 482, 2002 N.C. LEXIS 424
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 10, 2002·No. No. 662A01·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the Court of Appeals’ opinion that found error in the trial court’s entry of directed verdict for defendant Cooper Steel Fabricators.

We affirm that portion of the Court of Appeals’ opinion that affirmed the trial court’s entry of directed verdict for defendant James N. Gray Company.

The Court of Appeals is once again reminded of its responsibility to issue opinions in which the holding is readily understandable to the bench and bar. Knight Pub’g Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 131 N.C. App. 257, 506 S.E.2d 728 (1998), remanded for modification, 351 N.C. 98, 540 S.E.2d 36 (1999); Jones v. Asheville Radiological Grp., P.A., 129 N.C. App. 449, 500 S.E.2d 740 (1998), remanded with instructions, 350 N.C. 654, 517 S.E.2d 380 (1999). The Court of Appeals’ opinion in this case, in which a portion of the majority opinion was erroneously designated a dissent, while a portion of the dissent was found in what purported to be the majority opinion, was confusing and inappropriate.

REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maraman v. Cooper Steel Fabricators, 562 S.E.2d 420, 355 N.C. 482, 2002 N.C. LEXIS 424 (N.C. 2002).

562 S.E.2d 420 (Maraman v. Cooper Steel Fabricators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamby v. PROFILE PRODUCTS, LLC
676 S.E.2d 594 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Parker v. Glosson
641 S.E.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Commee v. Nucor Corporation
173 F. App'x 209 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)
Floyd v. McGill
575 S.E.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)