Jones v. Asheville Radiological Group

517 S.E.2d 380, 350 N.C. 654, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 722
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 23, 1999·No. No. 242A98·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remand this case to the Court of Appeals to modify its opinion in Jones v. Asheville Radiological Group, 129 N.C. App. 449, 500 S.E.2d 740 (1998). First, the majority holding is found within an opinion authored by Judge Greene titled “concurrence and dissent.” Because of the potential confusion to the bench and bar, this opinion format is unacceptable and must be modified on remand. Second, the Court of Appeals reversed in part the judgment of the trial court but, in so doing, failed to identify precisely which, if any, of plaintiffs claims should have survived defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the trial court.

Accordingly, we remand the decision of the Court of Appeals to that court for issuance of an opinion consistent with this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Asheville Radiological Group, 517 S.E.2d 380, 350 N.C. 654, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 722 (N.C. 1999).

517 S.E.2d 380 (Jones v. Asheville Radiological Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. Glosson
641 S.E.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Maraman v. Cooper Steel Fabricators
562 S.E.2d 420 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)
Knight Publishing Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
540 S.E.2d 36 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)