Maples v. Office of Personnel Management
This text of Maples v. Office of Personnel Management (Maples v. Office of Personnel Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-3132
MARIE C. MAPLES,
Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
Respondent.
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in AT844E080694-I-1.
ON MOTION
Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Marie C. Maples moves to supplement the record to include various documents
not before the Merit Systems Protection Board. Maples also moves for an extension of
time, until May 28, 2009, to pay the court's docketing fee.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion to supplement the record is deferred for consideration by the
merits panel that is assigned to hear the case.
A copy of this order and the motions papers regarding the motion to
supplement the record shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this
case. (3) The motion for an extension of time to pay the docketing fee is granted.
No further extensions should be anticipated.
FOR THE COURT MAY 2 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: Marie C. Maples David M. Hibey, Esq. MAY 2 9 2009 JIM liUttbitY s19 CLERK
2009-3132 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maples v. Office of Personnel Management, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maples-v-office-of-personnel-management-cafc-2009.