Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Zelefsky
225 A.D.2d 527, 639 N.Y.2d 95, 639 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1859
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The plaintiff established a prima facie case with the production of a promissory note executed by the parties and the undisputed assertion that the defendants defaulted on the note (see, Wagner v Triefler, 215 AD2d 648; Fritz v Scuderi, 203 AD2d 420; Silber v Muschel, 190 AD2d 727). The burden then shifted to the defendants to establish a triable issue of fact (see, Wagner v Triefler, supra; Silber v Muschel, supra), which they [528]*528failed to do. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Zelefsky, 225 A.D.2d 527, 639 N.Y.2d 95, 639 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 527 (Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Zelefsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Belizon
225 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)