Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Zelefsky

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Zelefsky

225 A.D.2d 527, 639 N.Y.2d 95, 639 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1859
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 527 (Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Zelefsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Zelefsky, 225 A.D.2d 527, 639 N.Y.2d 95, 639 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

The plaintiff established a prima facie case with the production of a promissory note executed by the parties and the undisputed assertion that the defendants defaulted on the note (see, Wagner v Triefler, 215 AD2d 648; Fritz v Scuderi, 203 AD2d 420; Silber v Muschel, 190 AD2d 727). The burden then shifted to the defendants to establish a triable issue of fact (see, Wagner v Triefler, supra; Silber v Muschel, supra), which they [528]*528failed to do. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Belizon
225 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 527, 639 N.Y.2d 95, 639 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manufacturers-hanover-trust-co-v-zelefsky-nyappdiv-1996.