Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Belizon
225 A.D.2d 527, 639 N.Y.2d 721, 639 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1860
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The plaintiff established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and the defendants failed to come forward with any evidence establishing a triable issue of fact (see, Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v Zelefsky, 225 AD2d 527 [decided herewith]). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Belizon, 225 A.D.2d 527, 639 N.Y.2d 721, 639 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 527 (Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Belizon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Staten Theatre Group
245 A.D.2d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)