Manturuck v. Meeks

Eleventh Circuit

Manturuck v. Meeks

395 F. App'x 667

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 14, 2010

DocketNo. 10-10193

StatusPublished

This text of 395 F. App'x 667 (Manturuck v. Meeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manturuck v. Meeks, 395 F. App'x 667 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint.

The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11th Cir.2010).

Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint.

The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11th Cir.2010).

Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

395 F. App'x 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manturuck-v-meeks-ca11-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack