Manturuck v. Meeks

Eleventh Circuit

Manturuck v. Meeks

395 F. App'x 667

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 14, 2010·No. No. 10-10193·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint.

The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11th Cir.2010).

Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint.

The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11th Cir.2010).

Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.

AFFIRMED.

Manturuck v. Meeks, 395 F. App'x 667 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

395 F. App'x 667 (Manturuck v. Meeks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related